Legal Opinion

Fiorucci v. C. F. Braun & Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided August 22, 1961No. 327PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lynch., J.:

The Industrial Accident Board was called upon to determine several factual issues in these proceedings, including these:

1. Had appellant physically recovered from the necessary operation for repair of the hernia he sustained while at work, so that he was, from a physical point of view, able to return to work and perform the duties incident to his employment?

2. Was appellant suffering from a psychological or psychosomatic condition arising from the injury and the resulting surgery, which was sufficient to disable him and so as to make him unable to return to work, and thus to have a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Barry v. SparksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. In Re Application of Plainfield-Union Water Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  5. Hartley v. . Eagle Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. DiSabatino Bros., Inc. v. WortmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  2. Battista v. Chrysler Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1982
  3. Battista v. Chrysler Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1986
  4. Avon Products, Inc. v. LamparskiSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  5. Ward v. General Motors Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API