Legal Opinion

General Motors Corporation v. Huester

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided April 30, 1968PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’HORA, Justice.

General Motors Corp., as employer, here appeals from a decision of the Industrial Accident Board of Delaware awarding workmen’s compensation to Frederick J. Huester for a back injury. Huester has cross appealed for higher attorney fees.

Huester, beginning in September, 1963, worked on an assembly line at a General Motors Assembly Plant, where it was his job to turn frames over onto carriers as they proceeded along the assembly line. On June 25, 1964, he injured his back while turning an “exceptionally hard frame”. After reporting the incident to his foreman, Huester went…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  2. Ham v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  3. M. A. Hartnett, Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  4. General Motors Corporation v. McNemarSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
  5. Theriot v. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Abex Corporation v. BrinkleySuperior Court of Delaware · 1969
  2. Hudson v. EI DuPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANYSuperior Court of Delaware · 1968
  3. State Home Improvement Co. v. DavisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1969
  4. Chrysler Corp. v. ViglinoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API