Bryant v. Welch Furniture Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.
It is contended for appellant that the motion for nonsuit should have been allowed for the reason chiefly that the machine in question being simple of structure and operated by plaintiff himself, no negligence can be imputed to defendant company, but in our opinion and on the facts presented the objection cannot be sustained. While the duties incumbent on employers in the exercise of reasonable care, to supply tools and appliances reasonably safe and suitable for the work, are not as exigent in regard to simple tools and appliances as in other cases, they are not relieved of any and all…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mercer v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Holt v. Oval Oak Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Lytton v. Marion Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Featherstone v. Lowell Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Rogerson v. . HontzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Scott v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Fulcher v. Pine Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Luttrell v. . HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Theurer v. Holland Furnace Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.