Legal Opinion

Platt v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 10, 1947No. 3469PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of forfeiture of a 1941 Chrysler automobile under 49 U.S.C.A. § 782. Sec. 782 in part reads: “Any vessel, vehicle, or aircraft which has been or is being used in violation of any provision of section 781, or in, upon, or by means of- which any violation of section 781 has taken or is taking place, shall be seized and forfeited; * * *

Section 781 (a) in part reads as follows: “It shall be unlawful * * * (3) to use any vessel, vehicle, or aircraft to facilitate the transportation, carriage, conveyance, concealment, receipt, possesion,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Law v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Pon Wing Quong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  4. Andrews v. St. Louis Joint Stock Land Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  5. Mach v. Abbott Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. T I Federal Credit Union v. DelBonisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  3. United States v. One 1974 Cadillac Eldorado Sedan, Serial No. 6l47s4q407966Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. $39,000 in Canadian CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  5. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API