Legal Opinion

Stiles v. Freemotion, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 11, 2002No. 970062CC; A107561PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Plaintiff fractured his right leg in a snowboarding accident at Mount Hood Meadows. He sued Nidecker Enterprise, the manufacturer of the snowboard, and Freemotion, Inc., the dealer who supplied it to him, for negligence and product liability. A jury returned a verdict for defendants. Plaintiff appeals, assigning error to the trial court’s decision to give jury instructions based on Oregon’s Skiing Activities Law, ORS 30.970 to 30.990. Plaintiff argues that those statutes apply only to claims against ski area operators, not against manufacturers or suppliers of ski or snowboard equipment.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Community Bank v. United States Nat. Bank of Ore.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Nolan v. Mt. Bachelor, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Bray v. American Property Management Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Hutcheson v. City of KeizerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vokoun v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Erickson v. American Golf Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Freeby v. Hoodoo Ski Bowl Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. Freeby v. Hoodoo Ski Bowl Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API