Legal Opinion

Rasmussen v. Garthus

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1961PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

The plaintiffs are asking for a new trial because of errors during the trial and in the interest of justice. The principal errors alleged to have been committed have to do with the instructions given to the jury by the court. Plaintiffs had requested the following instruction:

“In determining whether or not Barbara Rasmussen was exercising the care that one of her age, capacity, discretion, knowledge, and experience would exercise under the same or similar circumstances, due consideration should be given to the child’s instincts, for while the child may have the knowledge of an adult…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brice v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Hanson v. BinderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Zillmer v. MiglautschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Lovesee v. Allied Development Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Koczka v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Kohler v. DumkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Millonig v. BakkenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API