Legal Opinion
Walker v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided March 27, 1944No. Docket 149/660PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Complainants' bill is for discovery only against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, hereinafter referred to as P.R.R. Defendant moves to strike the bill.
The bill alleges that complainants, who are employees of the Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines, hereinafter referred to as P.R.S.L., intend to file a bill against their employer alleging against it that it has failed and is failing to abide by the terms of certain agreements entered into between it and its employees, of whom complainants are some; that the failure of P.R.S.L. to abide by said agreements has resulted and will in the future…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Post & Co. v. Toledo, Cincinnati, & St. Louis RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Coca-Cola Co. v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Brown v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
- President of the Middletown Bank v. RussSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1819
- Kurtz v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Beckwith v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Davila v. Continental Can Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- RICHARD RICHARDSON VS. SKY ZONE, LLC (L-1796-19, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021