Post & Co. v. Toledo, Cincinnati, & St. Louis Railroad
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
This is a hill in equity, brought by a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Ohio, and it seeks discovery only. There is no doubt that such a bill is within the jurisdiction of the court. Pub. Sts. c. 151, § 2, cl. 14; c. 198, §46. St. 1883, c. 223, § 10.
The statutory provisions whereby parties are made competent witnesses, and are permitted in suits at law or in equity to obtain from each other the discovery of facts and documents by filing interrogatories, have not taken away the jurisdiction of the court to entertain bills of discovery, although they may affect the exercise…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New Haven Horse Nail Co. v. Linden Spring Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Child v. Boston & Fairhaven Iron WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Burgess v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
- Mitchell v. MattinglyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
- Mitchell v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Marshall v. . ShermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Gregonis v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Howarth v. LombardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Guerney v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.