Legal Opinion
The United States v. Southern Ute Tribe or Band of Indians
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 20, 1970No. Appeal 7-66PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Judge.
This ease comes to us on appeal from a decision of the Indian Claims Commission which, in an interlocutory order dated May 16, 1966, found the appellant, the United States, liable to the appellee, the Southern Ute Tribe or Band, for (1) just compensation for taking 230,547.44 acres of land, and for (2) a “further and complete” accounting for funds held in trust. Although notice of appeal was filed on August 4, 1966, after briefing and oral argument we remanded to the Commission for supplemental findings of fact. Upon making the requested findings the Commission again…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- The Snoqualmie Tribe of Indians, on Its Own Behalf, and on Relation of the Skykomish Tribe of Indians v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Navajo Tribe of Indians v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- The United States v. The Northern Paiute NationUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Southern Ute Tribe or Band of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. HessCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, Montana v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Navajo Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.