Legal Opinion

United States v. Hess

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 5, 1999No. 98-1127PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRORBY, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from an action brought by the United States against Appellants Lulu Mae Hess, Loyd Hess, Alton Hess and LLH Development Corporation (collectively referred to as the “Hess family”). The government seeks quiet title to ownership of gravel located on a ranch acquired by the Hess family as successors-in-interest following a land exchange patent issued pursuant to the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, 25 U.S.C. §§ 461— 479. At issue is whether the reservation of “all minerals” in the exchange patent, as reserved by the government in trust for the Southern…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ben Ezra, Weinstein, & Co. v. America Online Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. The Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  3. Matson v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  4. Hoery v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  5. United States Ex Rel. Purcell v. MWI Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API