Legal Opinion
Petition of Ittel
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 6, 1986No. C3-85-1694PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
The trial court concluded that the Joint County Ditch Board of Carver and Sibley counties acted arbitrarily and unlawfully in establishing judicial ditch number 23 and vacated the order. The trial court remanded the case to the Ditch Board for a rede-termination of benefits and damages. Appellants, the original petitioners seeking establishment of the ditch, argue that the trial court’s finding that the Ditch Board acted arbitrarily and unlawfully is clearly erroneous. We affirm.
FACTS
On August 31, 1981, appellants filed a petition with the Joint County Ditch Board for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Seidlitz v. County of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Oelke v. County of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Gee v. County of RenvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marriage of Carrick v. CarrickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- In Re the Redetermination of Benefits of Nicollet County Ditch 86ACourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Matter of Branch A-38, Jt. Ditch No. 204Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987