Legal Opinion

Gee v. County of Renville

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 14, 1954No. 36,168PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying appellant’s motion for an order vacating the verdict of the jury and granting a new trial.

Appellant is the owner of a 200-acre improved farm in Eenville county, Minnesota. He acquired the farm in November 1947 and moved onto it at that time. He became affected by the establishment of Eenville County Ditch No. 116 and appealed to the district court from the order of the county commissioners of Eenville county filed September 22, 1952. That order approved the report of the viewers in the ditch proceeding and fixed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seidlitz v. County of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Alden v. County of ToddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  3. In Re Improvement of County Ditch No. 1, Yellow Medicine CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Dinehart & Weck Security Co. v. WeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Redetermination of Benefits of Nicollet County Ditch 86ACourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Petition of IttelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. In re SchwarzeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API