Reishus v. Bullmasters, LLC
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JUDGE LICHTENSTEIN
¶ 1 This case involves the intersection between the common law rights held by tenants in common to possess, use, and enjoy their property, and contract provisions that purport to forego some of those property rights.
¶2 In this.,declaratory judgment action, defendants appeal the district court’s judgment that an amendment to an ownership agreement was valid and binding on all tenants in common who hold ownership interests in a ranch. The amendment was adopted by the vote of fewer than all the tenants in common and placed restrictions on all the co-owners’ access to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Butler v. RaffertyNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Flying Diamond Oil Corp. v. Newton Sheep Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
- Taylor v. CanterburySupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Lookout Mountain Paradise Hills Homeowners' Ass'n v. Viewpoint AssociatesColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Sumerel v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re: Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020