Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Canterbury

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 28, 2004No. 03SC294PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

I. INTRODUCTION

The question we address in this case is whether one joint tenant may extinguish a joint tenancy by conveying his interest in real property back to himself as a tenant in common. In the past, courts did not honor such transactions because of two premises: one, that someone could not be both a grant- or and a grantee in the same real property transaction; and two, that in order to extinguish a joint tenancy, a joint tenant had to destroy one of the "four unities" of time, title, interest, or possession.

What is not at issue in this opinion is whether a joint tenant may destroy a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Tenhet v. BoswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Smith v. GreenburgSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  4. First National Bank v. Energy Fuels Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  5. Hendrickson v. Minneapolis Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Maniez v. Citibank, F.S.B.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. In Re the Estate of JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  3. Hildebrand v. New Vista Homes II, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. In Re Estate of MurphyColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Huber v. KennaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API