Legal Opinion

Association of the Bar of the City of New York and New York County Lawyers Association v. Abraham J. Isserman

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 9, 1959No. 193, 194, Dockets 25160, 25161PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

It is now thoroughly settled that “disbarment by federal courts does not automatically flow from .disbarment by state courts.” Theard v. United States, 354 U.S. 278, 282, 77 S.Ct. 1274, 1276, 1 L.Ed.2d 1342; Selling v. Radford, 243 U.S. 46, 37 S.Ct. 377, 61 L.Ed. 585; In re MacNeil, 1 Cir., 266 F.2d 167. Making the thorough examination of the record which these cases require us to undertake, we are constrained to conclude that Judge Hincks’s very careful and precisely buttressed judgment marks the extent of the punishment appropriate for this appellant. Indeed, the two-year suspension of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sacher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. In the Matter of the Petition of SellingSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. In Re Disbarment of IssermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re IssermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API