New Britain Trust Co. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMukphy, J.
The defendant railroad, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, has appealed from a judgment rendered upon a verdict for the plaintiff which the trial court refused to set aside. The only assignment of error which we are to consider relates to the action of the trial court in denying the motion to set aside the verdict. The assignment of error attacking certain portions of the finding is treated as abandoned, since it is not mentioned in the defendants’ brief. Samelson v. Harper’s Furs, Inc., 144 Conn. 368, 369, 131 A.2d 827. It is unnecessary to refer to the finding, because the action of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Scoville v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Pape v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Tenney v. Pleasant Realty CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Sawicki v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Wadlund v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tough v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Cruz v. DrezekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Szela v. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Monahan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- White v. E & F CONSTRUCTION CO.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.