Legal Opinion
Tenney v. Pleasant Realty Corporation
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 15, 1949PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDickenson, J.
These are appeals from the denial of motions to set aside a verdict for the plaintiff in a negligence action in which the owners and the lessee of property claimed to have been in a defective condition are codefendants. All of them claim lack of evidence to support the jury’s conclusion of negligence and further contend that the verdict was excessive. The defendant owners, in addition, claim that they had no possession or control of the premises.
On January 25, 1944, between 4 and 5 p. m., the plaintiff went to trade at a market at 747 Park Street, Hartford. When about to enter it she slipped…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crogan v. SchieleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
- Horvath v. TontiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Ruocco v. United Advertising CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Perkins v. WeibelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Aprile v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wilson v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Starr v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Noebel v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Moon Area School District v. GarzonySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Crowe v. WardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.