Legal Opinion
Pape v. Cox
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 1, 1942PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAveky, J.
The plaintiff brought this action under General Statutes, § 1481, against the state highway commissioner to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by a defective condition of a state highway due to ice. The question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court was justified in reaching the conclusion that the icy condition upon the highway at the point where the plaintiff was injured had existed for a sufficient length of time to charge the defendant with constructive notice of its existence and afford reasonable opportunity to remedy it. The following facts found by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Aaronson v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Perrotti v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Carl v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Congdon v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
- Drible v. Village Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Baker v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Lukas v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Kolich v. ShugrueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.