Legal Opinion

Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Arnold

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 14, 1916No. 6049PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from County Court, Jackson County; J. M. Williams, Judge. Action by V. M. Arnold against the Wichita Falls &. Northwestern Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

This action was-commenced for the purpose of recovering damages occasioned by the destruction of 25 acres of pasture and certain fence posts belonging to V. M. Arnold, plaintiff herein, which, it is alleged, .were destroyed by fire through the negligence of the railway company in allowing sparks-to emit from its locomotive, causing said fire. The case was tried to a jury, resulting in a judgment for plaintiff..

It is insisted that this cause be reversed because the verdict is not sustained by- sufficient evidence. It was shown at the trial that the premises were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. B. F. Blaker & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. PerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ShannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Planters' Cotton & Ginning Co. v. PennySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schaff v. CoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Midland Valley R. Co. v. RupeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. GantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. SimerlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Midland Valley R. Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API