Legal Opinion

Roller v. PAN MUTUAL ROYALTIES

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 28, 1952No. 35068PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neal, J.

The parties here appear in the same relative position as in the trial court. R. E. Roller will be referred to as plaintiff, and the Pan Mutual Royalties, as defendant, and certain individuals as interveners.

Under the amended petition plaintiff alleged that he was the owner of two separate tracts of land in Garvin county, Oklahoma, and that in 1931 and 1932 he executed and delivered to the Pan Mutual Royalties, a trust estate, two separate mineral deeds conveying an undivided interest in the oil, gas and other minerals in and under said tracts of land. That under the oral representations of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Atteberry v. AulickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Fisk v. BullardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Bartlett v. LashleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Davenport v. Board of Education of City of DrumrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edwards v. UriceCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. Edwards v. UriceCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API