Legal Opinion
Bartlett v. Lashley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 6, 1951No. 33768PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArnold, C.J.
This action involves the surface rights only to 160 acres of land in Creek county, Oklahoma, described as: West Half of Northeast Quarter; Northeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter; and Northwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter, Section 27, Township 14 North, Range 8 East.
Essential facts disclosed by the evidence are:
That for a number of years prior to 1930 the fee-simple title to this land was held jointly by H. W. Bartlett, Eva Maude Bartlett, and H. E. Whitehead, as tenants in common; that they severed the mineral estate and received royalties from oil production thereon, and that such royalties…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Webb v. KetchamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Evans v. TerrillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Pitts v. DrummondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
3Cited by6 opinions
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Fane Development Company v. TownsendSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Henderson v. GiffordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Kennedy v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Roller v. PAN MUTUAL ROYALTIESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.