Legal Opinion

Atteberry v. Aulick

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 22, 1951No. 33982PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This is a suit brought by the plaintiffs in error, as plaintiffs, against Mrs. Lee Aulick, as defendant, for specific performance of a contract pertaining to 20 acres of land in Oklahoma county, Oklahoma. During the trial of said cause, Roscoe R. Aulick was made an additional party defendant. The cause was tried by the court without the aid of a jury and resulted in a judgment for the defendants, from which plaintiffs have appealed.

The contract involved herein was executed on April 23, 1945, and the pertinent part thereof is as follows:

“Contract for Deed.
“This Agreement, Made and entered into…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nelson v. HamraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Crutchfield v. GriffinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Garrett v. ReinhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Campbell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Hoodenpyl v. GuinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Moree v. MoreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  2. Harrison v. AlbrightColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Asher v. HullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Buechner v. RouseColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Davis v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API