Legal Opinion

Dubail v. Department of Transportation

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 28, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Justice.

[¶ 1] Richard and Georgia Dubail appeal from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Brennan, J.) on the Department of Transportation’s motion in the Dubails’ personal injury action. The Dubails contend that the court erred by determining as a matter of law that the DOT’s alleged negligence did not occur “during the performance” of construction, street cleaning, or repair operations, within the meaning of 14 M.R.S.A. § 8104-A(4)’s exception to governmental immunity pursuant to the Maine Tort Claims Act, 14 M.R.S.A. §§ 8101-8118 (1980 & Supp.1997).…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Petillo v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  2. Berard v. McKinnisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  3. Lynch v. Town of KitterySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  4. Thompson v. State Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. New Orleans Tanker Corp. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  2. Grossman v. RichardsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  3. Rice v. City of BiddefordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  4. Gove v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. Paschal v. City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API