Legal Opinion

Paschal v. City of Bangor

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 23, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.

[¶ 1] The City of Bangor appeals from the denial of its motion for a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Hjelm, J.) in a suit brought by Charles Paschal. 1 The court held that the existence of genuine issues of material fact precluded it from finding that the Maine Tort Claims Act granted the City immunity from Paschal’s negligence claim under the Maine Tort Claims Act. 2 We agree with the City’s contention that it is immune under the Maine Tort Claims Act and that none of the exceptions to immunity are applicable so as to preclude the entry of a summary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. Webb v. HaasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  3. Struck v. HackettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  4. Prescott v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  5. Clockedile v. State Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brawn v. Oral Surgery AssociatesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  2. Robin McDonald v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API