Legal Opinion
United States v. Eight Packages & Casks of Drugs
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 15, 1910No. 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLISTER, District Judge.
The libel-ant represents that certain packages and casks of drugs are labeled and marked and branded on the outside in a certain way. The marking on each is described, the description differing only in the designated numbers of each, and it may suffice to quote the marking and branding of one. “Prescription Products Company, Dayton, Ohio, S. 59884, P. D. Co. No. (1).” The casks or packages are represented as being within and on the premises of the Prescription Products' Company, in Dayton, Ohio, and owned by or in the possession of that company for the purpose of…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Dobbins's Distillery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Stone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. 935 CASES MORE OR LESS, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- United States v. Eighteen Cases of Tuna FishDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1925
- United States v. Fifty-Eight Drums of Material Designed for Manufacture of Intoxicating LiquorDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1930
- Bynoe v. HellingDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- McCorvey v. PetersenDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2025