Legal Opinion
United States v. Eighteen Cases of Tuna Fish
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided April 20, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDOWELL, District Judge.
This is a proceeding for forfeiture under the Eood and Drugs Act. The information does not allege previous seizure of the food sought to be condemned, and admits that it is in the possession of its owner, a wholesale dealer in groceries in this district. The information is not verified or supported, otherwise than by an affidavit by an assistant district attorney, which reads: “The foregoing facts are true to the best of affiant’s knowledge and belief.” The prayer is for the issue of monition attachment. For present purposes I shall assume that the Food and Drugs Act…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
- Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Mexican Central Railway Co. v. PinkneySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- United States v. 935 CASES MORE OR LESS, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- United States v. KennedyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1946
- United States v. Undetermined Quantities of Depressant or Stimulant DrugsDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1968
- District of Columbia v. LittleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.