State v. Sowell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
I
In his sole assignment of error relating to the trial, defendant Samuel contends that his constitutional rights were violated when a law enforcement officer, Detective Franklin Lovette, was permitted to testify that Samuel declined to talk with him until he had conferred with an attorney. Detective Lovette testified that he had attempted to interview Samuel while Samuel was in the hospital in Dillon, S. C. The following colloquy occurred between the prosecutor and Detective Lovette:
Q. All right. Did you have any conversation with him there?
A. After getting approval of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. LaddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. SalmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986