Legal Opinion

Harriman Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of New York v. Perry

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 30, 1936No. 22Published

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The complaint in the case before us alleged: (1) That defendants’ testator Perry made his promissory note dated October 10, 1932, wherein he promised to pay to the order of the plaintiff Harriman National Bank & Trust Company the sum of $170,-000 six months after date, with interest, and that- no part of the note was paid, though payment was demanded at maturity; (2) that on October 13, 1932, defendants’ testator Perry had and received $170,000, the property of the bank, and promised to pay the same, but failed to make payment after demand. The receiver of' the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Grand Forks v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Wasmann v. City Nat. Bank of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  3. Jackman v. Continental Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Smith v. First Nat. Bank of CasseltonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  5. Continuous Zinc Furnace Co. v. American Smelting & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API