Legal Opinion
People v. Mumm
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 30, 2002No. D035303PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
120 Cal.Rptr.2d 18 (2002)
98 Cal.App.4th 812
The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Jake Michael MUMM, Defendant and Appellant.
No. D035303.
Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One.
April 30, 2002.
Review Denied July 17, 2002.
Peggy A. O'Neill and Cindi B. Mishkin, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, San Diego, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, David P. Druliner, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Rhonda L. Cartwright-Ladendorf, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
HALLER, Acting P.J.
In superior court…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- People v. RielCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. AveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. OrtegaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. Wright, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Stamps, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Becerra, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Sexton, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.