Legal Opinion

People v. Sexton

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided July 15, 2019No. D075380PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDato, J.

*459Defendant Daniel Frank Sexton was convicted of several crimes committed against Jane Doe, his ex-wife.1 During the course of the investigation, Jane first accused him of domestic violence, later recanted her allegations, and then reverted to her original statements. At trial, the jury received *460testimony from an expert who offered her professional opinion about statements typically made by victims of intimate partner battering. Specifically, the expert asserted that it is not unusual for victims of intimate partner battering to cycle between periods of seeking assistance from law enforcement…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. WaidlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. Griffin CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. People v. Mitchell CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. People v. Mitchell CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. Oskuie CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. Sloop CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API