Legal Opinion

Flores v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided May 3, 1990No. 01-88-01103-CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNOR, Justice.

This case is an endless chain scheme. 1 Gene Flores, appellant, was convicted, fined $1,000, and sentenced to 180 days in jail. He appeals. We affirm.

Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a brief in which she concluded the appeal is frivolous and without merit, but proposed one arguable point. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). See Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); Ex parte Wilson, 781 S.W.2d 421, 422 (Tex.App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 1989, no pet.).

The Anders…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Currie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Harrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. Ashcraft v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
  3. Shpikula v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  4. Hubbard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API