Legal Opinion
American Family Insurance Group v. Kiess
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 1, 2004No. A03-1764PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant American Family Insurance Group challenges the district court’s order confirming a no-fault arbitration award in favor of respondent Mark Kiess. Appellant argues that the award should be vacated because (1) the amount of the award, including penalty interest, exceeded the no-fault statute’s jurisdictional limit; (2) the arbitrator lacked the authority to award respondent interest on his award; (3) appellant was entitled to collateral-source deductions; and (4) respondent lacked standing to assert the no-fault claim against appellant. We affirm the district…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Imlay v. City of Lake CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Collins v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. KiessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- American Family Insurance Group v. KiessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Mark a Brown Trust v. William T Kussy JrMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020