Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Jordan v. Pattishall
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 8, 1930PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
In this case alternative writ of mandamus was issued to the respondents. Return was made by the respondents and the matter now comes on for hearing on motion for peremptory writ to be directed to respondents.
The relator was a licensed dentist practicing his profession in Tampa, Florida. A so-called accusation was filed against him under the provisions of Sec. 18 of Chapter 10109, Acts of 1925, which appears as Sec. 3551, Rev. Gen. Stats. 1927.
Under the provisions of this statute the proceedings against the accused are penal. The accusation is required-to be filed in writing before the Florida…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Ex Parte BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Ex Parte BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- State ex. rel. Wolfe v. KirkeSupreme Court of Florida · 1868
- State ex rel. Fowler v. FinleySupreme Court of Florida · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Neal v. BryantSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- Bowling v. Department of Ins.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- South Atlantic Steamship Co. of Delaware v. TutsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Vining v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COM'NSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Bach v. Florida State Bd. of DentistryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.