Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Williams

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1973No. 38531PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

This is an appeal in an action for malpractice. At the first trial the jury was unable to agree. The trial court declared a mistrial and ordered a new trial. The defendant appeals from the order overruling her motion for judgment in accordance with her motion for a directed verdict made at the close of the evidence and granting a new trial. Appellate review of such an order is authorized by section 25-1315.03, R. R. S. 1943, although no verdict was returned. In re Estate of Fehrenkamp, 154 Neb. 488, 48 N. W. 2d 421.

The plaintiff is 43 years of age. The defendant is a licensed physician who…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Fehrenkamp's EstateNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Douglas v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Meyer v. MoellNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Mangiameli v. ArianoNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gambill v. StroudSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Ditloff v. OttoNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas, Inc. v. Running M Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Edquist v. Commercial Savings & Loan Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Edquist v. COMMERCIAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONNebraska Supreme Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API