Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Johnson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1944No. 31686PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

This is an action for malpractice. It was tried to a jury-in the district court and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals. We reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the case.

The matter was originally filed as a claim, in the form of a petition, against the estate of Dr. Czar C. Johnson, deceased. Objections were filed. The claim was allowed in the sum of $1,800. The administratrix appealed.

A petition was filed in the district court, wherein plaintiff alleged that Dr. Johnson, therein called the defendant, was a physician and surgeon engaged in the practice…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pilgrim v. LandhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  2. Brewer v. RingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Fortner v. KochMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Reed v. ChurchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  5. Moncrief v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. CorbinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Corn v. FrenchNevada Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Baker v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1964
  4. Maercklein v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  5. Lagerpusch v. LindleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API