Fink v. Baer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
After verdict for plaintiff defendant appeals from the order denying his alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
Plaintiff at the time of the accident was a passenger in defendant’s sedan driven by himself. He stopped in front of plaintiff’s home to permit her to alight. Instead of putting his gears into neutral, he left them in low speed with the clutch disengaged. Plaintiff had been riding in the rear seat. Defendant, in turning to open the door or keep it open while she alighted, in some way inadvertently released the clutch pedal, thereby permitting the gears to engage and the car…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Skoglund v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Lacas v. Detroit City Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Belyea v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Sainte Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Felker v. Bangor Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
- Gilson v. City of CadillacMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Phillips v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1952
- Boland v. MorrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Paulos v. KoelschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Harrison v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
- Janke v. JankeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.