Legal Opinion

Engler v. General Electric Co.

District Court, D. New York

Decided June 20, 1941Published

1Opinion of the Court

CONGER, District Judge.

Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings as to the patent interference branch of this action is denied.

This motion to dismiss is made by the defendant on the ground that plaintiff’s patent expired May 6, 1941, and that consequently plaintiff can no longer claim defendant’s patents interfere with his. However, the expiration of plaintiff’s patent occurred after the institution of his suit herein and the subsequent expiration of his-patent does not deprive this court of jurisdiction. Beedle v. Bennett, 122 U.S. 71, 7 S.Ct. 1090, 30 L.Ed. 1074. The propriety of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Beedle v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Goldschmidt Thermit Co. v. Primos Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API