Goldschmidt Thermit Co. v. Primos Chemical Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
In Equity. _ Suit by the Goldschmidt Thermit Company against the _ _ Primos Chemical Company. On motion to dismiss bill.
1Opinion of the Court
DICKINSON, District Judge.
This motion is based upon the three grounds of the existence of an adequate remedy at law, want of equity, and laches. The first two blend into one, and the last is not seriously pressed.
The positions taken and arguments advanced on the respective sides are alike in this: That they ignore the existence of the rules of practice in the courts of equity in the United States, which were called to the attention of counsel at the oral argument at bar as having a controlling bearing upon the main point involved. If the equity rules are to be ignored, as the printed briefs…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Clark v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Tompkins v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pierce v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Kelley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- King Mechanism & Engineering Co. v. Western Wheeled Scraper Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- Georgia-Carolina Gravel Co. v. BlassingameSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Engler v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New York · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.