Legal Opinion
Wells v. Harris
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 29, 1999No. Nos. B:89CV391 WWE, B:89CV-482 WWEPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*130 RULING ON TRUSTEE’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT COMPLAINT AND TO SEVER CAUSES OF ACTION
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Richard M. Coan, Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estates of Arochem International, Inc. and Arochem Corporation (the “Trustee”) moves this Court for the entry of an order, pursuant to Rules 15(a) and 15(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for leave to file his Trustee’s Amended and Supplemental Complaint. The Trustee further moves for an entry of an order, pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, severing the Trustee’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc., E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and New York Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,005 State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corporation and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re Cardiac Devices Qui Tam LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- CITY OF MOUNDRIDGE, KS. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- BRS Associates, L.P. v. DanskerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Banks v. YorkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Health Insurance Ass'n of America v. Goddard Claussen Porter NovelliCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.