Legal Opinion
Wilhelm v. Haemmerle
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided November 9, 1953No. 43196PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
262 S.W.2d 609 (1953)
WILHELM
v.
HAEMMERLE.
No. 43196.
Supreme Court of Missouri. Division No. 1.
November 9, 1953.
Motion to Modify Opinion and Order of Affirmance Denied December 14, 1953.
Paul H. Koenig, William L. Mason, Jr., Koenig, Dietz & Mason, St. Louis, for appellant.
Wilbur C. Schwartz, St. Louis, for respondent. Joseph Nessenfeld, St. Louis, of counsel.
HOLLINGSWORTH, Judge.
In this action plaintiff seeks to recover damages in the sum of $25,000 from defendant, an individual doing business as "Clayton and Suburban Express", for personal injuries sustained from acetic acid sprayed upon him…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lilly v. BoswellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Hughes v. St. Louis National League Baseball Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Steuernagel v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Wicker v. Knox Glass Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Lindsey v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Badahman v. Catering St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Ukman v. Hoover Motor Express Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Boswell v. Steel Haulers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Sanders v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Morris v. Israel Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.