Legal Opinion

Mercer v. Knox

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 10, 1946No. 9546PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUGH, Justice.

Knox, as receiver of Allied Underwriters, sued T. E. and George E. Mercer in the District Court of Dallas County, for additional premiums alleged to be due by the Mercers on certain insurance policies issued to them by the Allied Underwriters, a reciprocal or inter-insurance exchange. Upon the death of T. E. Mercer’suit was dismissed as to him. George E. Mercer filed a plea of privilege to be sued in Tarrant County, the county of his residence. This plea was duly controverted, hearing had thereon, and the plea overruled, from which order this appeal is prosecuted.

Appellee…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co. v. Dallas Steam Laundry & Dye WorksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Port Iron & Supply Co. v. Casualty UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Glenn H. McCarthy, Inc. v. Southern UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Watson v. Nortex Wholesale Nursery, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1992
  2. Roach v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Howell v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Norman v. Safway Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Peninsular Life Insurance Company v. HanrattyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API