Legal Opinion

Howell v. Knox

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 3, 1948No. 9675PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAYMOND GRAY, Justice.

Will G. Knox as receiver of the Texas Fire and Casualty Underwriters, a reciprocal insurance exchange organized under the provisions of Chap. 20, Title 78, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, Vernon’s Ann.Civ. St. art. 5024 et seq., brought this suit, as a class action, against H. H. Howell and 29 named defendants, individually and as representatives of 4,298 unnamed defendants, and alleged all defendants were subscribers of said Texas Fire and Casualty Underwriters. The suit was for the purpose of obtaining a levy of an assessment against the subscribers under the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Du BoseTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Consolidated Underwriters v. KellyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  3. Richardson v. Kelly, Recr.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Kelly v. Consolidated UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Southern Ornamental Iron Works v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Manning v. BarnardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  2. Hurley v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Richards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Toliver v. BergmannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Seale v. Major Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API