Legal Opinion
State v. Craig
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 27, 2013No. A10-1938PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
Appellant Andrew Anthony Craig was found guilty by a Ramsey County jury of possessing a firearm as an ineligible person, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 624.713, subd. 1(2) (2012). After trial, Craig moved to vacate his conviction on the basis that the statute, as applied to him, violated the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. The district court denied the motion and entered judgment of conviction. The court of appeals upheld the statute as constitutional and affirmed Craig’s conviction. Because we conclude that application of section 624.713, subdivision…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Rhonda Ezell v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. MarzzarellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Propst v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
- People v. BurnsIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. AliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Hertz v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Olson v. One 1999 Lexus Mn License Plate No. 851ldv Vin: Jt6hf10u6x0079461Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.