Dereje v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Appellant Tsige Abebaw Dereje challenges his conviction of fifth-degree criminal sexual conduct, arguing that his stipulated facts trial, held pursuant to Minn. R.Crim. P. 26.01, subd. 3, was not valid, and that his right to a fair trial was denied by the ineffective assistance of his trial counsel.
We conclude that appellant’s trial on stipulated facts did not conform' to the express language of the-rule and therefore was not valid; but we further conclude that this error was harmless. But because we also conclude that appellant was denied the effective assistance of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BartyllaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- A.C. Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. KuhlmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Schneider v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dereje v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013