Kabi Pharmacia AB v. Alcon Surgical, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LONGOBARDI, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court in this patent infringement case is a motion by the Plaintiffs, Kabi Pharmacia AB and Pharmacia, Inc. (hereinafter referred to collectively as “Pharmacia”) to disqualify the law firm of Morgan & Finnegan from representing the Defendant, Alcon Surgical, Inc. (“Alcon”). Docket Item (“D.I.”) 55. The Plaintiffs assert that Morgan & Finnegan has represented Pharmacia at the same time that it has represented Alcon. Pharmacia argues that this concurrent representation of Alcon violates Delaware Rule of Professional Conduct 1.7(a) and that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,675 James M. Richardson v. Hamilton International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Anthony J. CostanzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- INA Underwriters Insurance v. NalibotskyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Nemours Foundation v. Gilbane, Aetna, Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1986
- Manoir-Electroalloys Corp. v. Amalloy Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
3Cited by10 opinions
- Guillen v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Buckley v. Airshield Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1995
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Barragree v. Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- Madukwe v. Delaware State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.