Legal Opinion
Russom v. United Services Automobile Ass'n
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided July 20, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 2055PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICE, Chief Judge.
The jury in this case has found, in response to special interrogatories, that at the time of the accident in question Norbert Enslen was using the Critchfield family automobile with the implied permission of Col. Critchfield. It is undisputed that on the occasion of the accident Enslen was using the Critchfield family car with the express permission of Mrs. Critchfield, and the jury has likewise found that Mrs. Critchfield was both impliedly and apparently authorized by her husband to grant permission to Enslen to use the car on the occasion of the accident. No other issues…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, Mich. v. Winget Winget v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, MichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Celanese Corp. Of America v. John Clark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Max T. Morgan v. Walter R. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Sampson v. Century Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United Services Automobile Association v. James B. RussomCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Gulf Insurance Company v. VelaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Lynette C.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Highway Casualty Company v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- Gulf Insurance Co. v. PlaskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.