Kilker v. Stillman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
INTRODUCTION
Following the entry of a judgment in favor of plaintiffs Terence A. Kilker and Paula J. Kilker (the Kilkers) and against defendant Frank C. Stillman, the trial court ordered Stillman to produce documents regarding his assets to the Kilkers. After Stillman failed to comply with that order, the trial court found Stillman in contempt and ordered, inter alla, that Stillman pay the Kilkers reasonable attorney fees and costs, plus interest. The underlying judgment was eventually satisfied.
To collect on the attorney fees and costs award, the Kilkers served a writ of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Sourcecorp, Inc. v. ShillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Schwartzman v. WilshinskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Kono v. MeekerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Conservatorship of LambertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
3Cited by7 opinions
- Licudine v. Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Krolikowski v. San Diego City Employees' Ret. Sys., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Gates v. MCT Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2015
- Coastline JX Holdings LLC v. BennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Krolikowski v. San Diego City Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.