Legal Opinion
Stanley ORZEL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF WAUWATOSA FIRE DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 3, 1983No. 81-2564PublishedCited by 124 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
The City of Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, appeals from the decision and order of a United States Magistrate finding the City liable, under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (the “ADEA” or the “Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. (1976 & 1978 Supp.), for illegally terminating the employment of its Assistant Fire Chief, Stanley Orzel, upon Orzel’s attainment of the City’s then-mandatory retirement age of 55. The City also challenges the magistrate’s finding of a “willful” violation of the ADEA and his consequent award of liquidated damages under 29 U.S.C. § 626(b). We affirm.
*746I
Pl…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- Alvin Hunter v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation, Engine Division, and Andre J. Lambert, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Western Air Lines, Inc. v. CriswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jacquelyn M. Quint v. A.E. Staley Manufacturing Company, Jacquelyn M. Quint v. A.E. Staley Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Gunther Graefenhain and Philip Miller, Cross-Appellees v. Pabst Brewing Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Keith Cross and Alfred Francis v. New York City Transit Authority and Gregory Warren, Docket No. 04-2912-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.