Legal Opinion
United States v. Frantz
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided February 6, 1953No. 1114PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Paul W. Brosman, Judge:
On his plea of guilty, the accused was-convicted by special court-martial1 of four offenses, three of which are of no consequence here. A board of - review set aside his conviction of the offense, charged in Specification 2 of Charge II, on the ground that its language did not allege a crime under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC §§ 551-736. Thereupon, The Judge Advocate General, United States Navy, certified the following question to this Court:
“Whether, as a matter of law, specification 2 of Charge II failed to allege an offense in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Hygrade Provision Co. v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. FoslerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
- United States v. SadinskyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. HolidayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- Levy v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Mark Avrech v. The Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.