Legal Opinion · Dissent

Crawford v. Halkovics

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1982No. 81-1903Published

1DissentClifford F. Brown, J.

The majority herein applies the common law principle of contributory negligence to uphold a jury verdict for defendant. In doing so, the court emphasizes that the issue whether plaintiff’s injury was due to her own negligent conduct is a question of fact for the jury to determine, and not subject to a directed verdict.

My concern is that the principle be applied evenhandedly in all cases, for plaintiff and defendant alike. Our holding today must be seen as a two-edged sword, so that in future cases the question whether injury is proximately caused by defendant’s negligence is also submitted to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Gedra v. Dallmer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Patton v. Pennsylvania Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Masters v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Viers v. DunlapOhio Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API